i have deducted gst tds under section 51 two times - 2% each. however, the bank has deducted the amount but is not beind reflected in GST Portal. what is the solution. should i claim refund?

i am tax payer of Hyderabad and DGGI of Mumbai issued summons. What reply should I give or should i attend the summon or can i request for the transfer of case to the nearest DGGI

i am tax payer of Hyderabad and DGGI of Mumbai issued summons which i did not attend. Now, DGGI is proposing a penalty under section 122. Can dggi of mumbai issue a penalty notice to the tax payer of hyderabad?

DRC 07 passed for a tax demand of Rs. 10 Lakh. filed appeal and pre deposit Rs. 1 lakh. APL 04 issued and confirmed demand of Rs. 50,000. Appeal required to be filed for disputed amount of tax Rs. 50000. Am i required to deposit Rs. 5,000 as pre - deposit again and if not can i apply for refund of Rs. 95,000.

read section 112(8) again it is not 20% additional but 10% additional

Suppose tax demand is Rs. 100. How much pre-deposit is required at the first appellate authority and at the GSTAT. read section 107 and Section 112

Affiliation fees charged by Universities from the schools and colleges whether subject to GST?

proceedings under Section 63 initiated by the department in ASMT 14. and in the same ASMT 14 penalty is also being levied under section 122. is this demand of tax and penalty in notice ASMT 14 a valid notice or not?

Statement of relevant facts having a bearing on question and statement containing the interpretation of law and /or facts as the case may be in respect of the aforesaid question

Whether GST is to be charged by the jeweller only on the making charges when the customer supplies bullion, or on the entire value of the jewellery including the value of gold. Statement of relevant facts having a bearing on question and statement containing the interpretation of law and /or facts as the case may be in respect of the aforesaid question

Clarify whether the change in purity from 24K gold (supplied by the customer) to 22K gold (in finished jewelry) raises any compliance issues under GST law. Determine whether weight differences between the customer-supplied bullion and the finished jewelry, due to process losses, soldering, or wastage, raise any compliance issues under GST law.

Confirm whether GST is leviable only on the making charges when the customer supplies bullion/ 22k gold/ mix purity gold to be refined by the jeweller for further processing, and the jeweler returns finished jewelry without transferring ownership of the gold. Determine whether the GST rate on making charges for job work on customer-supplied gold bullion to manufacture jewelry is 5% or 18%. Incase of the weight of the finished product being the same as the gold supplied by the customer/ incase of the weight being more than the weight supplied by the customer

What documents are required to be furnished while claiming refund in case of export of goods without payment of tax

I am tax payer who is required to mandatorily issue e invoice but for few transactions invoice was generated but e invoice was not generated. all other transactions are genuine. Can department levy penalty

A Ltd is a unit located in SEZ, it wish to supply computers in domestic area to B Ltd. what is the procedure required to be followed in respect of issuance of invoice and filing of returns for both supplier (A ltd) and recipient (b ltd).

GSTR 1: igst: Rs. Nil; CGST: Rs. 100; SGST: Rs. 100 and in GSTR 3B: igst: Rs. 200; CGST: Rs. nil; SGST: Rs. nil. The department is alleging short payment of tax of CGST and SGST and it is not adjusting the excess payment made vide IGST. Is it a revenue neutral exercise. read IGST Act section 17, 17A and Section 18 and related circulars which was issued for interest.

Can DRC-01A be withdrawn and fresh can be issued or amended?

I am tax payer engaged in the business of trading cement and saria (iron rod) and raid was conducted at my premises under section 67. During the raid a kacha parchi or a handwritten transactions was seized. in that hand written transaction i recorded transaction with URP. No invoice was generated but transaction was shown in GSTR 1 B2C. I am able to proof that what is transaction value shown in GSTR 1 b2c is more than what is recorded in kacha parchi as transaction value. But still department is claiming that none of the transaction of kaccha parchi is shown in GSTR 1 b2c. Is action of department valid and if yes under which clause of Section 122 penalty may be levied. or any other section

I am tax payer engaged in the business of trading cement and saria (iron rod) and raid was conducted at my premises under section 67. During the raid a kacha parchi or a handwritten transactions was seized. in that hand written transaction i recorded transaction with URP. No invoice was generated but transaction was shown in GSTR 1 B2C. I am able to proof that what is transaction value shown in GSTR 1 b2c is more than what is recorded in kacha parchi as transaction value. But still department is claiming that none of the transaction of kaccha parchi is shown in GSTR 1 b2c. Is action of department valid and is there any other method to prove that transaction is shown in GSTR 1 b2c

I am tax payer and raid was conducted at my premises under section 67. During the raid a kacha parchi or a handwritten transactions was seized. in that hand written transaction i recorded transaction with URP. No invoice was generated but transaction was shown in GSTR 1 B2C. I am able to proof that what is transaction value shown in GSTR 1 b2c is more than what is recorded in kacha parchi as transaction value. But still department is claiming that none of the transaction of kaccha parchi is shown in GSTR 1 b2c. Is action of department valid and is there any other method to prove that transaction is shown in GSTR 1 b2c

”During a search and seizure activity conducted by GST authorities on a dealer, the department seized a manual bill book which was issued to a local authority that has not enrolled in GSTIN, and this local authority provides job work to a local contractor who is also not enrolled in GSTIN to perform specific jobs while making payments to the contractor for these services, and the local contractor purchases goods required to perform the job work but specifically asks the supplying dealers to issue bills and invoices in the name of the local authority instead of the contractor's own name, creating a transaction chain where neither the local authority nor the local contractor has proper GST registration despite engaging in taxable activities, and the seized manual bill book serves as evidence of this systematic arrangement. Is this entire arrangement punishable under the CGST Act 2017, and if yes, what would be the exact penalty amounts applicable to each party involved (the dealer, local authority, and local contractor) and under which specific sections of the CGST Act 2017 would these penalties be imposed, and what are the most effective legal strategies and arguments to counter these charges, minimize penalties, or successfully defend against the allegations in this case?”