in case of b2c taxable supply tax payer do not issue triplicate invoices. is there any violation of rule 48 or any other rule
a tax payer to whom e invoice is mandatory also supplies exempted goods for which it issues Bill of supply. But this bill of supply is not in triplicate. is there any violation of rule 48 or any other rule
The tax payer is trader in taxable goods and exempted goods (supply of seeds). his aggregate turnover exceeds Rs. 25 crore. He maintains all his accounts in a tally an accounting software. As per seed act of government of india he is also require to maintain manual invoice book. that manual invoice does not comply with GST law. the officer is alleging that there is a violation of Rule 48 in a sense that triplicate copies are not being maintained. is the contention of officer correct?
The tax payer is trader in taxable goods and exempted goods (supply of seeds). his aggregate turnover exceeds Rs. 25 crore. He maintains all his accounts in a tally an accounting software. As per seed act of government of india he is also require to maintain manual invoice book. that manual invoice does not comply with GST law. the officer is alleging there is a violation of Rule 48. is the contention of officer correct?
ASMT 10 received dated 23.08.2024 and duly replied vide ASMT 11 dated 20.09.2024. Then DRC 01 was issued 11.11.2024 after a gap of 2 months. Reply to DRC 01 was submitted vide DRC 06 dated 11.12.2024. however there is a instruction that ASMT 12 has to be issued within 30 days of receipt of reply in ASMT 11. and if the officer do not issue ASMT 12 within 30 days of ASMT 11 then it will be deemed that officer is satisfied with the reply. Can DRC 01 be issued after ASMT 10 and that to after a gap of 2 months?
ASMT 10 received dated 23.08.2024 and duly replied vide ASMT 11 dated 20.09.2024. Then DRC 01 was issued 11.11.2024 after a gap of 2 months. Reply to DRC 01 was submitted vide DRC 06 dated 11.12.2024. Can DRC 01 be issued after ASMT 10 and that to after a gap of 2 months?
what is the place of supply in case of warehouse management services. like amazon gives it warehouse for keeping the seller goods from where the amazon will pack and transport goods. Amazon from karanataka, warehouse in karnataka and recipient is in tamil nadu.
The owner of premises and premises both is located in Karnataka. The owner leases this premises to a party Mr. A located in karnataka. Again Mr. A is sub-leasing to a party located in Tamil nadu. There are two transactions. Lease and sub-lease. what is the nature of supply inter state or intra state in both lease and sub-lease?
The owner of premises and premises both is located in Karnataka. This premises is sub-lease to a party located in Tamil nadu. what is the nature of supply inter state or intra state?
produce serial number 22
The search results show that transportation of specified goods by GTA, including "milk, salt and food grain including flour, pulses and rice; branded or non branded" is exempt from GST. in which serial number and it's notification number. pls produce that
khansari is exempted goods it is just like sugar and it is transported by GTA. whether i am required to pay GST on RCM
what type of evidence can be demanded by department under section 70 read with section 35
movement of goods without e way bill. the goods reached the destination. now the department is alleging there is no purchases of goods and there is only purchase of invoice to avail fake credit. whether penalty can be levied under section 122 and also examine section 68 can e way bill be examined after completion of movement of goods.
what is section 16 read with rules
Whether rcm applicable on renting of immovable property. if yes what is the effective date. and what notifications and circulars i should read.
can i claim refund if i have availed benefit of advance authorisation
the scn has been issued alleging mismatch of credit between gstr 2A and GSTR 3B while taking into consideration GSTR 9. the authority has taken the value of ITC carried forward to the year in dispute which was reported in the previous year GSTR 9. However the ITC pertaining to the previous year invoices availed in the present year which is in dispute is quite high, as compared in the figures reported in GSTR 9 of the previous year. the reason of such difference in previous year invoices is because several invoices were not recorded in the books of accounts of the tax payer in the previous year due to non receipt of goods or the invoices. however, invoice were appearing in the GSTR 2A of the previous year. what can be the grounds
double availment of transitional credit in the initial phase of gst implementation in gstr 3b as well as tran 1. SCN issued. demand and interest confirmed. Need grounds to defend the interest and penalty because ITC has already been reversed after investigation. In order to show bonafide tax payer had not used double credit. pls articulate the ground and insert a new ground justifying the ground non interest in terms of first proviso to Rule 88B(1) since balance was lying in cash ledger. now frame a grounds
pls articulate the ground and insert a new ground justifying the ground non interest in terms of first proviso to Rule 88B(1) since balance was lying in cash ledger
what if non utilisation being claimed by the tax payer is the balance lying in the form cash ledger balance because at the relevant time the gst portal did not allow blocking excess ITC by the tax payer for non - utilisation. on what component interest shall be computed. whether cash ledger balance will be subtracted while calculating the interest. balance cash ledger will be treated equivalent to credit ledger balance.